Communities and Patterns of Scientific collaboration

نویسندگان

  • T. S. Evans
  • Renaud Lambiotte
  • Pietro Panzarasa
چکیده

This paper investigates the role of homophily and focus constraint in shaping collaborative scientific research. First, homophily structures collaboration when scientists adhere to a norm of exclusivity in selecting similar partners at a higher rate than dissimilar ones. Two dimensions on which similarity between scientists can be assessed are their research specialties and status positions. Second, focus constraint shapes collaboration when connections among scientists depend on opportunities for social contact. Constraint comes in two forms, depending on whether it originates in institutional or geographic space. Institutional constraint refers to the tendency of scientists to select collaborators within rather than across institutional boundaries. Geographic constraint is the principle that, when collaborations span different institutions, they are more likely to involve scientists that are geographically co-located than dispersed. To study homophily and focus constraint, the paper will argue in favour of an idea of collaboration that moves beyond formal co-authorship to include also other forms of informal intellectual exchange that do not translate into the publication of joint work. A community-detection algorithm for formalising this perspective will be proposed and applied to the co-authorship network of the scientists that submitted to the 2001 Research Assessment Exercise in Business and Management in the UK. While results only partially support research-based homophily, they indicate that scientists use status positions for discriminating between potential partners by selecting collaborators from institutions with a rating similar to their own. Strong support T.S. Evans Imperial College London, Physics Department and Complexity & Networks R. Lambiotte Imperial College London, Institute for Mathematical Sciences P. Panzarasa Queen Mary University of London, School of Business and Management ar X iv :1 00 6. 17 88 v2 [ ph ys ic s. so cph ] 1 6 M ay 2 01 1

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Tie Strength Distribution in Scientific Collaboration Networks

Science is increasingly dominated by teams. Understanding patterns of scientific collaboration and their impacts on the productivity and evolution of disciplines is crucial to understand scientific processes. Electronic bibliography offers a unique opportunity to map and investigate the nature of scientific collaboration. Recent studies have demonstrated a counterintuitive organizational patter...

متن کامل

The myth of global science collaboration - Collaboration patterns in epistemic communities

Scientific collaboration is often perceived as a joint global process that involves researchers worldwide, regardless of their place of work and residence. Globalization of science, in this respect, implies that collaboration among scientists takes place along the lines of common topics and irrespective of the spatial distances between the collaborators. The networks of collaborators, termed ‘e...

متن کامل

بررسی شبکه هم تالیفی مجلات علمی پژوهشی فارسی حوزه علم اطلاعات و دانش شناسی

Purpose: the aim of this research is to design co-authorship network among Knowledge and Information science Persian Journals and to know the most important authors in the time period from 2008 to 2013. Moreover, in this article, co-authorship patterns and network integrity is measured.  Methodology: We used scientometric tools and methods and some of the most important social network indexes ...

متن کامل

بررسی میزان همکاری های علمی در مقالات قلب و عروق ایران در وبگاه علوم : 2002 تا 2011

    Introduction: Scientific collaboration is a process in which two or more authors share their ideas, resources, and data to create a joint work. This research attempted to study co-authorship, being a kind of scientific collaboration, in Iranian cardiovascular articles in Web of Science during 2002-2011.   Methods: The present research is. The population of this descriptive-analytical resear...

متن کامل

بررسی ضریب مشارکت پژوهشگران دانشگاه علوم پزشکی تهران در انتشارات بین المللی

    Collaboration Coefficient of Researchers of Tehran University of Medical Sciences in International Publications      Introduction: Collaboration between researchers at domestic and international level is an extensive form of scientific collaboration emphasizing the importance and benefits of collaborative research. This study was aimed at investigating the rate of collaboration between rese...

متن کامل

تحلیل و مصورسازی شبکه هم‌تألیفی دانشگاه‌های علوم پزشکی وابسته به وزارت بهداشت با استفاده از سنجه‌های تحلیل شبکه اجتماعی بر اساس داده‌های Web of Science

Background and Aim: Research in the medical field requires large budgets, specialist human resources and modern equipment and instruments. Scientific collaboration is a way to overcome such problems. Main goal of this study was analyzing scientific collaboration of universities of medical sciences in different aspects. Materials and Methods: In this research, by using scientometrics methods an...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • CoRR

دوره abs/1006.1788  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2010